USA|UK|EU|JAPAN 
 
TressCox Lawyers - Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane - Australian Legal Firm
ArrowAdministrative LawArrowInfrastructure
ArrowBanking & Financial ServicesArrowInsolvency
ArrowBuilding & ConstructionArrowInsurance & Corporate Risk
ArrowCompetition & Trade PracticesArrowIntellectual Property
ArrowCorporate, Commercial, M&AArrowInternational Business
ArrowEmployment & Industrial RelationsArrowLitigation & Dispute Resolution
ArrowEnergy & ResourcesArrowProperty & Planning
ArrowEntertainment, Communications & MediaArrowTax & Revenue
ArrowEstate Planning, Trusts & Estate LitigationArrowTechnology
ArrowGovernment & ProbityArrowWater
ArrowHealthArrowWealth Planning

More than a Century of “Connected Talent”

TressCox was first established in 1897 by Herbert Tress. After over a century of continuous improvement, TressCox has emerged as a firm with a reputation for directly responding to client needs with energy and efficiency.

Based in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, TressCox has an impressive track record in a variety of sectors such as health, media, entertainment, insurance and government.

At TressCox, we offer practical advice founded on a real understanding of our clients’ concerns. We connect. That’s what makes the difference.

Read more about our history.

Blurb

Early offices of TressCox, Pitt Street, 1920s

features





  • Interim Industrial Relations Legislation Take Effect

    The Rudd government’s interim industrial relations legislation took full effect at midnight on 27 March 2008.

    Under the new legislation employers ability to enter into new Australian Workplace Agreement’s (AWA’s) is limited.  AWA’s that were signed by both parties prior to midnight 27 March 2008 can still be lodged with the Workplace Authority for up to 14 days (up until midnight 10 April 2008).  AWA’s in existence prior to the proclamation of the legislation will still operate for the remainder of their 5 year term.

    Read More


  • GST and the margin scheme: The ATO gets more than it asked for

    The saga rolls on with the recent decision of Middleton J in the Federal Court in Brady King Pty Limited -v- Commissioner of Taxation 2008 FCA 81, handed down on 18 February 2008.   Put simply, if a supply is a taxable supply, the GST payable is 1/11th of the price of that supply.  However, the parties to a sale of real property can choose to use the margin scheme and so reduce the amount of GST payable to1/11th of the ‘margin’ for the supply. 

    Read More

Sydney +61 2 9228 9200
Melbourne +61 3 9602 9444
Brisbane +61 7 3004 3500
Search